| 翻訳と辞書 |
| NLRB v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co. ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
NLRB v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co.
''NLRB v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co.'' 304 U.S. 333 (1938) is a 7-0 decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that workers who strike remain employees for the purposes of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The Court granted the relief sought by the National Labor Relations Board, which sought to have the workers reinstated by the employer. However, the decision is much better known today for its obiter dicta〔Brisbin, ''A Strike Like No Other Strike: Law and Resistance During the Pittston Coal Strike of 1989-1990,'' 2002.〕〔Turner, "Restoring Balance to Collective Bargaining: Prohibiting Discrimination Against Economic Strikers," ''West Virginia Law Review,'' Spring 1994.〕〔Estreicher, "Strikers and Replacements," ''Labor Lawyer,'' 1987.〕 in which the Court said that an employer may hire strikebreakers and is not bound to discharge any of them if or when the strike ends.〔''NLRB v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co.,'' 304 U.S. 333, 345-346.〕
The ''Mackay'' doctrine, as the striker replacement portion of the ruling is known, is one of the most significant Supreme Court rulings in American labor law,〔Getman and Kohler, "The Story of 'NLRB v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co.': The High Cost of Solidarity," in ''Labor Law Stories,'' 2005.〕〔Atleson, ''Values and Assumptions in American Labor Law,'' 1983.〕〔Matheny and Crain, "Disloyal Workers and the 'Un-American' Labor Law," ''North Carolina Law Review,'' 2004.〕〔Pope, "How American Workers Lost the Right to Strike, and Other Tales," ''Michigan Law Review," 2004.〕 and has defined collective bargaining in the United States since its publication. "''Mackay Radio'' was more than a decision that provided an instrumental method for a firm to replace economic strikers and to resist their return to employment after a strike. It was also a decision that established important practices that constituted the conduct of union-management bargaining during the post-New Deal Era."〔Brisbin, ''A Strike Like No Other Strike: Law and Resistance During the Pittston Coal Strike of 1989-1990,'' 2002, p. 66.〕
The ruling is also highly controversial, even 70 years later. It is strongly and uniformly condemned by labor unions, and resolutely defended by employers. In the legal community, however, "the doctrine continues to provoke the notice and the nearly universal condemnation of scholars."〔Getman and Kohler, "The Story of 'NLRB v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co.': The High Cost of Solidarity," in ''Labor Law Stories,'' 2005, p. 13.〕
==Background==
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「NLRB v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co.」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|